Sun Tone Bronzing Crème - Soleil Parfait 1
Das Geheimnis eines authentischen Bronzeteints liegt nie in nur einem Farbton. Unser cremiges, begeh...
$37.50
$75.00
Category: {"translated":"Cream-to-Powder Bronzer"}
Wait, the instruction says to translate and localize, but also says to preserve brand names, product names, etc. "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is a product type name. For de-DE, it should be localized. But the instruction says "Product/category names: concise, searchable, and faithful." So I should translate it to German. However, the brand name is not present here. The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". In German, a natural translation would be "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is often kept in English in the beauty industry, but to localize, it could be "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer" or "Creme-Puder-Bronzer". But the instruction says to preserve product names? Actually, it says "Preserve brand names, product names, SKUs, model codes..." but this is a category name, not a specific product name. It's a generic term. So I should translate it. However, the instruction also says "Do not translate the brand name 'Official Site: Westman Atelier | Clean Beauty' unless it has an established localized form." That's not here.
Given the target language guidance for de-DE: "precise, trustworthy, concise German; avoid exaggerated hype; use common German e-commerce phrasing." So I'll translate it. But "Cream-to-Powder" is a specific texture description. In German, it's common to say "Creme-zu-Puder" or "Creme-Puder". But to be faithful, I'll do "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". However, many German beauty sites keep English terms. But the instruction says to localize, so I'll translate.
Let me check: The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". I'll output: "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". But is that natural? Alternatively, "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" is more concise. I'll go with "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" as it's common.
But wait, the instruction says "Do not invent product features" etc. This is just a translation. I'll do that.
So output: {"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}<｜end▁of▁thinking｜>{"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}
Sun Tone Bronzing Crème - Soleil Parfait 2
Das Geheimnis eines authentischen Bronzeteints liegt nie in nur einem Farbton. Unser cremiges, begeh...
$37.50
$75.00
Category: {"translated":"Cream-to-Powder Bronzer"}
Wait, the instruction says to translate and localize, but also says to preserve brand names, product names, etc. "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is a product type name. For de-DE, it should be localized. But the instruction says "Product/category names: concise, searchable, and faithful." So I should translate it to German. However, the brand name is not present here. The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". In German, a natural translation would be "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is often kept in English in the beauty industry, but to localize, it could be "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer" or "Creme-Puder-Bronzer". But the instruction says to preserve product names? Actually, it says "Preserve brand names, product names, SKUs, model codes..." but this is a category name, not a specific product name. It's a generic term. So I should translate it. However, the instruction also says "Do not translate the brand name 'Official Site: Westman Atelier | Clean Beauty' unless it has an established localized form." That's not here.
Given the target language guidance for de-DE: "precise, trustworthy, concise German; avoid exaggerated hype; use common German e-commerce phrasing." So I'll translate it. But "Cream-to-Powder" is a specific texture description. In German, it's common to say "Creme-zu-Puder" or "Creme-Puder". But to be faithful, I'll do "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". However, many German beauty sites keep English terms. But the instruction says to localize, so I'll translate.
Let me check: The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". I'll output: "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". But is that natural? Alternatively, "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" is more concise. I'll go with "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" as it's common.
But wait, the instruction says "Do not invent product features" etc. This is just a translation. I'll do that.
So output: {"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}<｜end▁of▁thinking｜>{"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}
Sun Tone Bronzing Crème - Soleil Parfait 3
Das Geheimnis eines authentischen Bronzeteints liegt nie in nur einem Farbton. Unser cremiges, begeh...
$37.50
$75.00
Category: {"translated":"Cream-to-Powder Bronzer"}
Wait, the instruction says to translate and localize, but also says to preserve brand names, product names, etc. "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is a product type name. For de-DE, it should be localized. But the instruction says "Product/category names: concise, searchable, and faithful." So I should translate it to German. However, the brand name is not present here. The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". In German, a natural translation would be "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is often kept in English in the beauty industry, but to localize, it could be "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer" or "Creme-Puder-Bronzer". But the instruction says to preserve product names? Actually, it says "Preserve brand names, product names, SKUs, model codes..." but this is a category name, not a specific product name. It's a generic term. So I should translate it. However, the instruction also says "Do not translate the brand name 'Official Site: Westman Atelier | Clean Beauty' unless it has an established localized form." That's not here.
Given the target language guidance for de-DE: "precise, trustworthy, concise German; avoid exaggerated hype; use common German e-commerce phrasing." So I'll translate it. But "Cream-to-Powder" is a specific texture description. In German, it's common to say "Creme-zu-Puder" or "Creme-Puder". But to be faithful, I'll do "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". However, many German beauty sites keep English terms. But the instruction says to localize, so I'll translate.
Let me check: The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". I'll output: "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". But is that natural? Alternatively, "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" is more concise. I'll go with "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" as it's common.
But wait, the instruction says "Do not invent product features" etc. This is just a translation. I'll do that.
So output: {"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}<｜end▁of▁thinking｜>{"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}
Sun Tone Bronzing Crème - Soleil Parfait 4
Das Geheimnis eines authentischen Bronzeteints liegt nie nur in einem einzigen Farbton. Unser cremig...
$37.50
$75.00
Category: {"translated":"Cream-to-Powder Bronzer"}
Wait, the instruction says to translate and localize, but also says to preserve brand names, product names, etc. "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is a product type name. For de-DE, it should be localized. But the instruction says "Product/category names: concise, searchable, and faithful." So I should translate it to German. However, the brand name is not present here. The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". In German, a natural translation would be "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer" is often kept in English in the beauty industry, but to localize, it could be "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer" or "Creme-Puder-Bronzer". But the instruction says to preserve product names? Actually, it says "Preserve brand names, product names, SKUs, model codes..." but this is a category name, not a specific product name. It's a generic term. So I should translate it. However, the instruction also says "Do not translate the brand name 'Official Site: Westman Atelier | Clean Beauty' unless it has an established localized form." That's not here.
Given the target language guidance for de-DE: "precise, trustworthy, concise German; avoid exaggerated hype; use common German e-commerce phrasing." So I'll translate it. But "Cream-to-Powder" is a specific texture description. In German, it's common to say "Creme-zu-Puder" or "Creme-Puder". But to be faithful, I'll do "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". However, many German beauty sites keep English terms. But the instruction says to localize, so I'll translate.
Let me check: The content is "Cream-to-Powder Bronzer". I'll output: "Creme-zu-Puder-Bronzer". But is that natural? Alternatively, "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" is more concise. I'll go with "Creme-Puder-Bronzer" as it's common.
But wait, the instruction says "Do not invent product features" etc. This is just a translation. I'll do that.
So output: {"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}<｜end▁of▁thinking｜>{"translated":"Creme-Puder-Bronzer"}